ATM and VPN's

Ryan Russell ryan at SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Tue Mar 21 17:06:05 EST 2000


For cases where the same part controls both endpoints, of course.  Many of
even the most paranoid aren't yet ready to dictate that everyone in the
world must encrypt to comunicate with them.  There are a few..

				Ryan

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Tina Bird wrote:

> Sure, it's paranoid.  But the expense and performance
> issues involved in encrypting everything are a lot 
> less than they used to be.  So the question is, why
> >not< encrypt everything going over a public network?
> 
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Franco Sabaris, Javier wrote:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:59:20 +0100
> > From: "Franco Sabaris, Javier" <jfranco at MUNDO-R.NET>
> > To: VPN at SECURITYFOCUS.COM
> > Subject: Re: ATM and VPN's
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > If you don't trust your ATM carrier, I can't see why you should trust your
> > voice carrier, or your point to point circuits provider. So, following the
> > same idea, you should encrypt every information (data or voice) that travels
> > outside your buildings. Isn't it a bit paranoic?
> > 
> > 
> > Saúdos,
> > Javier F.
> > 
> > VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.COM
> > 
> 
> "Doubt is an uncomfortable situation, but certainty is an 
> absurd one." -- Voltaire
> 
> VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.COM
> 

VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.COM




More information about the VPN mailing list