[vpn] vpn question

sam scure at redbulltech.com
Wed Jan 23 11:21:24 EST 2002


I couldnt have said it better myself. :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Tina Bird [mailto:tbird at precision-guesswork.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:40 AM
To: sam
Cc: Markwat at aol.com; vpn at securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: [vpn] vpn question


I feel obliged to point out that the totally
rockin' InfoExpress solution runs on a variety
of UNIX boxes, not just Windows systems.  The
server, that is; clients are available for
various Win flavors, Linux, Solaris, and sometimes
Machintoshes.

The main win in my book for their product is that
it's >not< IPsec -- which is often a problematic
set of protocols for remote access VPN users.  It's
TCP-based and really easy to use inside a firewalled
or NAT'ted environment.

tbird

"I was being patient, but it took too long." -
                                Anya, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"

Log Analysis: http://www.counterpane.com/log-analysis.html
VPN:  http://kubarb.phsx.ukans.edu/~tbird/vpn.html

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, sam wrote:

> Here are some thoughts...
>
> For software solution:
> InfoExpress (http://www.infoexpress.com/products/vpn/index.html) has
> software solution that sits on a dedicated Windows box and supports
> practically everything.
>
> For Hardware solution:
> I recommend the Nokia CryptoCluster series for site to site, client to
site,
> and site to 3rd party unmanaged site for its bandwidth, policy management,
> and pricing.
>
> Hope this helps. Feel free to contact me for any more information.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markwat at aol.com [mailto:Markwat at aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:07 PM
> To: vpn at securityfocus.com
> Subject: [vpn] vpn question
>
>
> I have a 5 branch company with 50 pc's throughout. Headquarters has 34,
and
> there are 4 in each of the others. We are on a Windows NT network, and our
> locations are connected by frame relay at 64 Kbps. We utilize VoIP.
>
> To save money, and give me the ability to get higher bandwidth, I would
> like to get rid of the frame relay, and switch to a VPN. I have done a lot
> of
> research, but am still confused as to whether I can simply implement
Windows
> NT (or Windows 2000) software VPN, or if I need to implement a hardware
> based
> VPN. I also am considering the possiblity of outsourcing. Can you offer me
> some advice?
>
>
> VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.com
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 1/11/2002
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 1/11/2002
>
>
>
>
> VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.com
>

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 1/11/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 1/11/2002




VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.com





More information about the VPN mailing list