[PATCH 03/12] mesh: Add action processing for mesh

Bob Copeland me at bobcopeland.com
Tue Nov 4 08:53:29 EST 2014


On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:36:44PM +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Natsuki Itaya <Natsuki.Itaya at jp.sony.com>
> Signed-off-by: Masashi Honma <masashi.honma at gmail.com>
> ---
>  wpa_supplicant/wpa_cli.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/wpa_supplicant/wpa_cli.c b/wpa_supplicant/wpa_cli.c
> index 1e1d029..25ac4c2 100644
> --- a/wpa_supplicant/wpa_cli.c
> +++ b/wpa_supplicant/wpa_cli.c
> @@ -3280,6 +3280,14 @@ static void wpa_cli_action_process(const char *msg)
>  			wpa_cli_connected = 0;
>  			wpa_cli_exec(action_file, ifname, "DISCONNECTED");
>  		}
> +	} else if (str_match(pos, MESH_GROUP_STARTED)) {
> +		wpa_cli_exec(action_file, ctrl_ifname, pos);
> +	} else if (str_match(pos, MESH_GROUP_REMOVED)) {
> +		wpa_cli_exec(action_file, ctrl_ifname, pos);

This reminds me - I know "MESH_GROUP" was chosen for similarity to
P2P.  I don't happen to know if any software expects this naming yet.
But would it make sense to use "MESH_BSS" or something similar since
one is more likely to encounter that language?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com


More information about the HostAP mailing list