RH 8.0 and hostap 10-12
pete at putzin.net
Sun Nov 24 23:28:43 EST 2002
Interesting, but if that's true, I would think 5Mb/s would be too high.
My experience with 10Mb/s ethernet, even with the best drivers and
lowest overhead equipment, is that you get a little above 9 Mb/s actual
transfer rate (TCP, not raw ethernet). I would assume that this
would/should be a little bit lower (is there extra overhead for
wireless? and I assume the driver isn't perfect yet). So, if it's half
duplex, then I would expect maybe 80% of that in ideal testing
conditions. I'm really seeing 90% according to netperf (assuming 5.5Mb/s
each way), so this makes me wonder a little bit. I'm not questioning,
but I would love to understand this all a little bit better. Thanks for
> On zo, nov 24, 2002 at 09:34:32 -0600, Peter Buelow wrote:
>> Quick question though. I get about 5mbs a sec using netperf with
>> default options and an MTU of 1500. This is about 4 feet from the
>> antenna, so link quality is excellent (92%). Really, even in my
>> bedroom (50ft), same rate. I know that on an 11mbs connection, all 11
>> isn't possible, but I was wondering if there are tuning options to
>> make up some of the other half I'm not getting? Maybe a different
>> MTU, or some fun with iwconfig or the driver? Just curious, as I
>> haven't seen anything in the message archives recent about this.
>> Thanks in advance.
> My own personal experience is that 5.5MBit/s is the best 802.11b can do.
> It's an 11MBit protocol, but it's 11MBit *half duplex*. This means
> 5.5MBit/s each direction. IIRC, the polling mechanism used in 802.11b
> does not adapt to suit the needs of the current traffic flow. This is
> one of the reasons I'm looking forward to 802.16. =)
> Of course, if anyone suggests a way to hack it to work, I'd love to
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety
deserveneither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
pete at putzin.net
More information about the HostAP