travis at traviswatson.com
Sat Apr 10 13:58:54 EDT 2004
You've already received some good recommendations and I don't mean to poor it
on, but you may want to look at m0n0wall as well for the smaller
site--particularly if management is cheap (http://m0n0.ch/wall/). It's
pretty cool stuff and the price is right.
Having said that, I usually lean toward Netscreen. They are very reasonable
in price, solid, and easy to manage. The only caustion I would give you is
that the 5-series has the 10 user and "unlimited" option for VPN. Ten nodes
through a tunnel can happen pretty quickly and the unlimited option just
about doubles the price. The 10 user limitation is for VPN only, however,
not general connectivity.
On Thursday 08 April 2004 08:39 pm, Paul R. Yaskowski wrote:
> I'm looking to setup a site-to-site VPN the replace a leased line used
> solely for AS/400 access. I have a couple questions as to what I should
> The main office consists of about 25 users with static SDSL. The remote
> office is about 5 users with dynamic ADSL.
> I've looked at the PIX-501, but I've always been a little scared of
> per-user licensing. If I purchased a 10-user PIX-501, and set it behind the
> SDSL at the main office, it would only allow 10 users to get Internet
> No matter what product I choose, would a site-to-site VPN work with a
> static address on one side and a dynamic on the other?
> Would any PIX handle PPPoE with a dynamically assigned IP?
> The company is cost-conscious, and I've looked at the PIX-506E, without the
> per-user licensing, but it is 50% more.
> Any comments or suggestions as to which products I should look at would be
> a great boon to me. I prefer Cisco products, because I am familiar with
> their interface, but am flexible.
> I would appreciate any help with this, I had Cisco certs back in the
> hey-day, but I worked with them so rarely that I let the certs expire.
> VPN mailing list
> VPN at lists.shmoo.com
More information about the VPN