[VPN] Question for site to site VPN

Roger Qian roger.qian at sholodge.com
Mon Mar 24 10:36:03 EST 2003


Thank you Dana, if not using PIX, what Cisco device is better for the site
to site VPN, router or concentrator? Can all customers share a same IP
address pool?
Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: Dana J. Dawson [mailto:djdawso at qwest.com]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:24 PM
To: vpn at lists.shmoo.com
Subject: Re: [VPN] Question for site to site VPN


Since you have to use access-lists as part of the VPN configuration to 
define all the hosts and/or networks at each end of each tunnel, if you 
configure all the VPN tunnels with the database server as the only local 
host, then it will do what you want.  The PIX should be fine for this, 
assuming you don't otherwise exceed its VPN capacity.

HTH

Dana

-- 

Dana J. Dawson                     djdawso at qwest.com
Senior Staff Engineer              CCIE #1937
Qwest Communications               (612) 664-3364
600 Stinson Blvd., Suite 1S        (612) 664-4779 (FAX)
Minneapolis  MN  55413-2620

"Hard is where the money is."



Roger Qian wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We're a hotel service provider. If we setup a site to site VPN system with
> our customers how to keep the privacy for each customer on the VPN system.
> We only need each customer to talk to a database server in our end only
and
> no talk between any customers.  We have a existing PIX 515UR firewall, do
we
> need to buy a dedicated Cisco device to act as a VPN gateway?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Roger
> _______________________________________________
> VPN mailing list
> VPN at lists.shmoo.com
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
VPN mailing list
VPN at lists.shmoo.com
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/vpn



More information about the VPN mailing list