VPN configuration

Stephen Hope SHOPE at DATARANGE.CO.UK
Sun May 14 07:40:43 EDT 2000


Of course, you could always use the smae level of encryption over Frame as
over a VPN, and since you are on a private infrastructure, that should be
more secure, as access is more difficult than for Internet.

Stephen

Stephen Hope C. Eng, Network Consultant, shope at datarange.co.uk,
Datarange Communications PLC, part of Energis, WWW:
http://www.datarange.co.uk
Carrington Business Park, Carrington, Manchester , UK. M31 4ZU
Tel: +44 (0)161 776 4190 Mob: +44 (0)7767 256 180 Fax: +44 (0)161 776
4189


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Russell [mailto:ryan at SECURITYFOCUS.COM]
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 6:03 PM
> To: VPN at SECURITYFOCUS.COM
> Subject: Re: VPN configuration
>
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2000, Jeanne Wright wrote:
>
> > I am working on a WAN design for a 130 store retail
> operation in 5 states. I
> > want to do credit card authorizations as well as data
> transfers and web
> > applications. The 2 main designs recommended by different
> companies are a
> > 56K Frame or a 56K VPN.
> >
> > Has anyone gone through this analysis already and found
> that one or the
> > other is better in uptime, throughput and security?
>
> Frame wins for uptime and throughput.  VPN (IMHO) wins for
> security.  Some
> folks here classify frame as a type of VPN.  I'm assuming you mean VPN
> with decent crypto, which frame will typically not have.
>
> > I am leaning towards a
> > VPN but am concerned about the credit card authorization
> and the costs to
> > manage the VPN.
> >
>
> How hard the VPN is to manage depends heavily on what type (bramd
> really) of VPN you're looking at.
>
> If I may be cynical for a moment...  Frame and VPN networks
> are not the
> palce to steal credit cards.  As long as there are much
> easier places to
> get them (the trash, verifyers running over analog lines at 2400 BAUD,
> website with bad security) then you're fine I'm sure.  I don't mean to
> tell someone not to take as many security measures as they want.. but
> consider the relative risks.
>
> 					Ryan
>
> VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.COM
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to
whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Datarange Communications PLC.
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this
email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying
of this email is strictly prohibited.

We have an anti-virus system installed on all our PC's and therefore any files
leaving us via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses.
Datarange Communications PLC accepts no responsibility once an e-mail
and any attachments leave us.

If you have received this email in error please notify Datarange Communications
IT department on +44 (0) 1494 476222..
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VPN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.COM




More information about the VPN mailing list