[osiris-devel] 3.0.4-current development documentation?

[Alexei Roudnev]

Btw - sorry, if I was not understanding - I have not any, even minimal,
complain about it. (And it is Brian who makes a decision, anyway).

I'd like just to prevent the case, when, instead of good technical document
we have a lot of JavaDoc generated documents, which are pretty correct and
pretty useless without something, linking them together and explaining, how
it all works.  I saw many such projects, and I do not want to see osiris
going intpo the same blackhole...

Alex

PS. Fortune-500 company means nothing except huge burocrasy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Wotring" <brian at shmoo.com>
To: "Osiris Developers" <osiris-devel at lists.shmoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [osiris-devel] 3.0.4-current development documentation?


>
> On Feb 21, 2004, at 2:13 PM, Thomas Jones wrote:
>
> > Has someone already generated the proper documentation for the Osiris
> > system
> > development?
>
> Not to my knowledge, no.
>
> > I didn't notice it on the website; so I went ahead and generated the
> > appropriate documentation in the following formats:
> >
> > - - html
> > - - latex
> > - - xml
> > - - pdf
> >
> > Does anyone want a copy of these? BTW.....I changed the comment
> > structure of
> > all struct's to the JavaDoc specification. Is this a problem, Brian?
> > It would
> > be alot more efficient to change the source headers so as to be easily
> > recognizable during generation. Is that ok?
>
> Yes, this is fine.  I have no problem with doing this.
>
> --
>      Brian Wotring ( brian at shmoo.com )
>      PGP KeyID: 0x9674763D
>
> _______________________________________________
> osiris-devel mailing list
> osiris-devel at lists.shmoo.com
> https://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/osiris-devel
>