<div dir="ltr">Hi Janusz, take a look at the results (still more than 1Gb/s):<div><br></div><div>Client:<br><div><br><div><div>iperf -V -c fe80::ff:fe00:100%sta1-wlan0 -t 20</div><div>------------------------------------------------------------</div><div>Client connecting to fe80::ff:fe00:100%sta1-wlan0, TCP port 5001</div><div>TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)</div><div>------------------------------------------------------------</div><div>[ 14] local fe80::ff:fe00:0 port 51271 connected with fe80::ff:fe00:100 port 5001</div><div>[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth</div><div>[ 14] 0.0-20.0 sec 2.88 GBytes 1.24 Gbits/sec</div><div>------------------------------------------------------------</div><div><br></div><div>Server:</div><div><br></div><div>Server listening on TCP port 5001</div><div>TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)</div><div>------------------------------------------------------------</div><div>[ 15] local fe80::ff:fe00:100 port 5001 connected with fe80::ff:fe00:0 port 51271</div><div>[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth</div><div>[ 15] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.44 GBytes 1.24 Gbits/sec</div><div>[ 15] 10.0-20.0 sec 1.44 GBytes 1.23 Gbits/sec</div><div>[ 15] 0.0-20.0 sec 2.88 GBytes 1.24 Gbits/sec</div></div><div><br></div><div>Client (sta1-wlan0) and Server (sta2-wlan0) are stations that are connect to the AP (using hostapd) on the wlan3 interface.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-05-13 6:31 GMT-03:00 Janusz Dziedzic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com" target="_blank">janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 12 May 2015 at 14:22, Ramon Fontes <<a href="mailto:ramonreisfontes@gmail.com">ramonreisfontes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I have tested IPv6 and I got the same results. :(<br>
><br>
</span>Does ping6 works correctly eg. ping6 fe80::f6b7:e2ff:fe38:83f3%wlan0 (*)<br>
<br>
<br>
Server:<br>
iperf -V -s -i 10<br>
<br>
Client:<br>
iperf -V -c fe80::f6b7:e2ff:fe38:83f3%wlan0 -t 20 (*)<br>
<br>
(*):<br>
fe80::f6b7:e2ff:fe38:83f3 - wlan1 ipv6 addr<br>
%wlan0 - send this packet using wlan0 iface<br>
<br>
BR<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Janusz<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> 2015-05-12 8:24 GMT-03:00 Ramon Fontes <<a href="mailto:ramonreisfontes@gmail.com">ramonreisfontes@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
><br>
>> Hi Janusz, than you.<br>
>><br>
>> Is there another option to use network namespace instead of netns? I have<br>
>> defined the network namespace to stations, like the image attached. If I use<br>
>> tcpdump on the ap I can see the packets from one to another station and if<br>
>> they are not connected to ap, it not possible ping between them.<br>
>><br>
>> -- Sent from my android<br>
>><br>
>> Em 12/05/2015 02:31, "Janusz Dziedzic" <<a href="mailto:janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com">janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com</a>><br>
>> escreveu:<br>
>>><br>
>>> On 11 May 2015 at 13:45, Ramon Fontes <<a href="mailto:ramonreisfontes@gmail.com">ramonreisfontes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> > Hi Mr Bhave, thank you for your reply. Look at this image<br>
>>> > <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/0vobpagbvp4sifn/Screenshot1.png?dl=0" target="_blank">https://www.dropbox.com/s/0vobpagbvp4sifn/Screenshot1.png?dl=0</a>. The<br>
>>> > average<br>
>>> > is more than 1Gb, but I am using mode G. What is wrong with my<br>
>>> > topology?<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> You have wlan1/wlan2 on the same PC - same IPv4 class. Traffic<br>
>>> wlan1<->wlan2 never goes via AP (air) while IP stack is smart enough<br>
>>> and send them directly between interfaces.<br>
>>> You can use ipv6 scope link instead of ipv4 addresses (iperf -V<br>
>>> option) or use network namespaces.<br>
>>><br>
>>> BR<br>
>>> Janusz<br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>