<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">Roy,<br><br>You're correct and I apologize. It does work with a specified lease time. But, what's the difference with that vs. not specifying it? And, why is it different in v3 vs v2?<br><br>Chris<br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org><br>To: hostap@shmoo.com<br>Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2007 7:59:46 AM<br>Subject: Re: wpa_authentication but dhcp timeout<br><br><div>On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 03:46:43 -0800 (PST)<br>Chris McGinley <cemcginley@yahoo.com> wrote:<br>> Check out this link to get info on my conversation with the dhcpcd<br>> developer - <a target="_blank"
href="http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159029">http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159029</a><br><br>You never did get back to me to say if specifying any lease times<br>solved the issue or not :P<br><br>If this does indeed fix the error then I really have no clue<br>what-so-ever as specifying a lease time is optional in RFC2131<br><br>Thanks<br><br>Roy<br>_______________________________________________<br>HostAP mailing list<br>HostAP@shmoo.com<br><a target="_blank" href="http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap">http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap</a><br></div></div><br></div></div><br>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com </body></html>