david.goodenough at btconnect.com
Tue Aug 16 11:40:40 EDT 2011
On Tuesday 16 Aug 2011, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 04:37:13 PM David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 Aug 2011, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 04:10:31 PM David Goodenough wrote:
> > > > As a side question, why would a card not be allowed to be an AP? I
> > > > can understand why it might not be capable of being an AP, but
> > > > surely if anyone is allowed to be an AP (and having clients but no
> > > > AP is no use to anyone) why are some cards not allowed to be an AP?
> > >
> > > Because [at least in the US] the FCC dictates that an AP which
> > > operates in the 5GHz band has to support DFS and TPC.
> > >
> > > http://www.elliottlabs.com/documents/dynamic_frequency_selection_and_5g
> > > hz_b and.pdf [http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/DFS]
> > >
> > > Currently, neither DFS nor TPC are not implementated, therefore you are
> > > not allowed to operate a 5GHz AP, the law is as simple as that.
> > In which case should the list say that DFS and/or TPC are required.
> Are you questioning your own government :D ? They make the laws, so you
> have to ask them.
Its not my government, I am in the UK and so not subject to the FCC. However
Ofcom do have similar requirements.
Its not the reason it is disabled I was questioning, it was the way that
the user was told about it.
> > I seem to recall that there is work going on to do this
> not anymore.
That is a big shame. The developers/DFS page you reference above does
not indicate that the effort has stopped. But the last IRC action plan
is last year, so maybe it just stopped.
More information about the HostAP