PEAP VS. EAP-FAST

Bryan Kadzban bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Fri Oct 27 07:01:05 EDT 2006


jon.garciadesalazar at telvent.abengoa.com wrote:
> So, if I use a WPA2 capable hardware along with wpa_supplicant there
> should be no problem to use either of them (PEAP or EAP-FAST). Am I
> right?

I do not believe there should be any problem.  (As long as EAP-FAST is a
publicly-documented protocol, and is implemented in wpa_supplicant, that
is.  I believe it is both, but I am not sure.  Ah, yes, it is supported
-- the wpa_supplicant page has it in its list.)

If there is a problem, posting wpa_supplicant's debug logs here (-dd or
-ddt if you want timestamps) should help track it down.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/attachments/20061027/fc3fe6d2/attachment.pgp 


More information about the HostAP mailing list